Key Summary
We compiled 3,530 reviews of Potenza by Gangnam Unni and Babitalk whose purpose was pores or scars. The progression method was almost the same for the pores and scar reviews (average 2.6 times, about 4 weeks apart, 600 to 700 shots), 46% of the scar reviews said they were quite painful, and the average time for redness and scabs to subside was 3.2 days, which was greater than the pores review (30%, 1.9 days).
- The positive-review rate was 86% (842) for pores, 81% (131) for scars, and 88% (326) for reviews that included both pores and scars. The rates of reviews that said the target area improved were 89%, 84%, and 95%, respectively.
- There were many reviews about receiving Juvelook or skin booster together. Juvelook in combination was 14% of the pores reviews and 12% of the scar reviews, and the positive-review rate was 91% (181 cases) for Juvelook combination and 88% (176 cases) for skin booster combination.
- The average cost per time mentioned in the reviews was about 154,000 won for pores and about 155,000 won for scars. The regular selling price of Gangnam Unni is about 195,000 won on average at 26 clinics based on the general tip for the entire face.
86% of the 1,299 reviews about the effect said it was good, but 99% of the reviews were written within a month after the procedure, so it is impossible to know from the reviews how long the effect lasts.
What is Potenza and how is it used for pores and scars?
Potenza is an RF microneedling procedure that delivers high-frequency heat into the skin with a thin needle, and many reviews wrote about pores and acne scars together. According to a review of 42 RF microneedling studies in 2021, the process of reorganizing the dermis and creating collagen was slow and gradual, so improvement continued until 6 months after the procedure.
There were only 240 reviews that mentioned the type of tip. 111 were pore tips that aim at pores with a needle, 118 were pumping tips that add drugs such as Juvelook or skin booster, and 7 were diamond tips that do not insert needles. This article is not based solely on the results of the Potenza equipment, but is based on reviews and similar RF microneedling research.
Which concerns are most common in Potenza reviews: pores or scars?
Dividing the 3,763 reviews, pores were the most common at 2,175, followed by 957 reviews using pores and scars together, and 398 scars. There were 233 reviews for other purposes such as elasticity or acne, and this article covers 3,530 reviews for pores or scars.
| Purpose of writing a review | Number of reviews | ratio |
|---|---|---|
| pores | 2,175 cases | 62% |
| pores and scars together | 957 cases | 27% |
| acne scars | 398 cases | 11% |
Among the 515 reviews about pores, 337 were about loss of elasticity, 140 were about sebum and shine, and 38 were a combination of the two. Of the 209 reviews that used scar shapes, 133 were pitted scars (the shape was not used), 28 were mixed types, 21 were red marks, and 16 were pigmentation marks. There were 7 rolling, 3 boxcar, and 1 awl scars, so they were not compared by shape.
How was the progression different in the pores and scar reviews?
The number of times, interval, and number of shots were similar in the reviews about pores and scars, with the highest number of reviews receiving 3 shots. The average of the 963 reviews that wrote about the number of shots was 2.6, the average of the 171 reviews that wrote about the number of shots was 4.2 weeks, and 71% of the 149 reviews that wrote about the number of shots were 600 to 799 shots.
| progress | pores reviews | Scar Review | Reviews written by both |
|---|---|---|---|
| average number of times | 2.6 times (604 cases) | 2.7 times (91 cases) | 2.6 times (268 cases) |
| 3 reviews | 48% (290 out of 604) | 47% (43 out of 91) | 51% (137 out of 268) |
| Review received only once | 20% (121 out of 604) | 25% (23 out of 91) | 21% (56 out of 268) |
| average interval | 4.2 weeks (126 cases) | 3.8 weeks (11 cases) | 4.4 weeks (34 cases) |
| Average number of shots | 651 shots (97) | 637 shots (17) | 692 shots (35) |
| Review of numbing cream | 86% (273 out of 318) | 89% (42 out of 47) | 87% (120 out of 138) |
The interval (11) and number of shots (17) in the scar review are less than 20, so the average fluctuates significantly. Hospital settings, such as tip type, needle depth, and energy, are rarely written in reviews, so this article compares pores and scars in terms of number of cases, pain, and recovery time.
What was the Potenza effect like on pores and scars?
Of the 1,299 reviews on the effect, 86% said it was good, and by purpose, 86% said it was for pores, 81% for scars, and 88% said both. 9% said it was average for pores, 10% for scars, and 7% for both, and 5%, 9%, and 5% said it was ineffective.
| Purpose of writing a review | Reviews with effects | Good review | Normal | There was no effect | Percentage of reviews that said the target area improved (number of self-written reviews) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pores | 842 cases | 86% | 9% | 5% | 89% (494 cases) |
| scar | 131 cases | 81% | 10% | 9% | 84% (80 cases) |
| Both pores and scars | 326 cases | 88% | 7% | 5% | 95% (182 cases) |
The pores varied depending on the state. As for scars, there are few reviews about the shape, so I only wrote about shapes that had more than 15 reviews about the effect.
| pores status | Number of reviews | Reviews with effects | Good review |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decreased elasticity | 337 cases | 130 cases | 92% |
| Sebum, shine | 140 cases | 59 cases | 80% |
| A mixture of two | 38 cases | 25 cases | 92% |
| scar shape | Number of reviews | Reviews with effects | Good review |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indented scar (shape not used) | 133 cases | 60 cases | 87% |
| Mix of types | 28 cases | 15 cases | 87% |
There were 11 and 8 reviews saying that it was effective for red marks (21 cases) and pigmentation marks (16 cases), which were not many. By number of times received, 78% (105) of reviews were good once, 86% (99) of reviews twice, 85% (178) of reviews three times, and 80% (55) of reviews four or more times were good (based on pores reviews and reviews written by both).
Would the reviews be different if I received Juvelook or skin booster together?
Reviews that wrote that they received Juvelook or skin booster together were 22% for both pores and scars, and the positive-review rate was not much different from reviews that did not use the combination treatment. 86% (829 cases) of reviews that did not use the combination treatment said it was good, and 87% (470 cases) of the reviews that used the combination treatment said that it was good.
| Treatment received together | pores reviews | Scar Review | Reviews written by both |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juvelook | 14% (294 cases) | 12% (49 cases) | 15% (146 cases) |
| Skin booster such as Rejuran | 10% (215 cases) | 11% (42 cases) | 8% (79 cases) |
| Skin Botox | 3% (63 cases) | 1% (2 cases) | 1% (11 cases) |
| Fraxel | 0.3% (6 cases) | 1% (5 cases) | 2% (15 cases) |
| Treatment received together | pores and both reviews: Effective reviews, good reviews | Scars and both reviews: reviews of effectiveness, good reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Juvelook | 181 cases, 91% | 72 cases, 83% |
| Skin booster such as Rejuran | 176 cases, 88% | 64 cases, 94% |
| Skin Botox | 35 cases, 80% | 3 out of 4 |
Fraxel and Aqua Peel had 12 and 11 reviews saying they were effective, so there were quite a few. Whether or not it is used in parallel depends on the hospital's consultation and pricing conditions, so the effectiveness of the combination cannot be judged based on the reviews.
What was the difference between the general tip and the pumping tip review?
There were 240 reviews about the type of tip, 90% (50) of the pores tip reviews, and 81% (58) of the pumping tip reviews were good. Of the 118 pumping tip reviews, 100 were reviews of receiving Juvelook or skin booster together.
| Tip | Number of reviews | Reviews with effects | Good review | average number of times | It was quite painful |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| poresTip | 111 cases | 50 cases | 90% | 3.1 times (35 cases) | 40% (22 out of 55) |
| pumping tip | 118 cases | 58 cases | 81% | 2.1 times (37 cases) | 20% (13 out of 66) |
As for DiaTip, all 7 reviews said the effect was good, and there were no reviews saying it was quite painful (2 reviews said it was painful). There are only 7 reviews of DIA Tips, so I did not compare them proportionally with other tips.
How sick is Potenza?
Of the 1,342 reviews about the level of pain, 34% said it was quite painful, followed by 46% for scars, 37% for both, and 30% for pores.
| Purpose of writing a review | Number of reviews | It almost didn't hurt | It was bearable | It was quite painful |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pores | 850 cases | 31% | 39% | 30% |
| scar | 129 cases | 26% | 29% | 46% |
| Both pores and scars | 363 cases | 29% | 34% | 37% |
Most of the anesthesia was anesthesia cream (435 cases), 42 cases were sedation, and 26 cases were local anesthesia. 40% of the reviews said that the pores tip was quite painful, and 20% of the reviews said that the pumping tip was quite painful.
How long will the redness and scab last after Potenza?
The average time for redness and scabs to subside was 2.0 days (319 cases), for pores it was 1.9 days, and for scars it was 3.2 days.
| Purpose of writing a review | average | Number of reviews | 2 days or less | 5 days or more |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pores | 1.9 days | 205 cases | 68% (139 cases) | 9% (19 cases) |
| scar | 3.2 days | 23 cases | 52% (12 cases) | 30% (7 cases) |
| Both pores and scars | 2.1 days | 91 cases | 70% (64 cases) | 13% (12 cases) |
The average scar review period of 3.2 days is based on 23 cases. The pores tip reviews averaged 3.1 days (14 cases), and the pumping tip reviews lasted 2.3 days (24 cases).
What was the inconvenience behind Potenza?
Among the 3,530 reviews, the most common complaints were pain in 589 cases (16.7%) and redness in 258 cases (7.3%).
| bitter inconvenience | Number of reviews | ratio |
|---|---|---|
| pain | 589 cases | 16.7% |
| blushing | 258 cases | 7.3% |
| cost burden | 46 cases | 1.3% |
| Acne comes up | 37 cases | 1.0% |
| swelling | 34 cases | 1.0% |
| bruise | 29 cases | 0.8% |
| dry | 22 cases | 0.6% |
| scab | 14 cases | 0.4% |
| Scratches remain during the procedure | 7 cases | 0.2% |
| Rather, it gets worse | 6 cases | 0.2% |
There were 62 reviews (1.8%) that said they regretted it or did not recommend it. There were reports that it was ineffective, that it was painful, and that the consultation and price information were disappointing.
How much is Potenza?
The one-time average of the prices disclosed by the hospital was about 195,000 won for the general face tip (26 clinics) and about 306,000 won for the pumping tip (4 clinics), and the average one-time price written in the reviews was about 154,000 won for pores, about 155,000 won for scars, and about 162,000 won for both.
| Category | Average per episode | range | number of places | standards |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whole face general tip (N tip) | Approximately 195,000 won | 119,000 won to 374,000 won | 26 clinics | Gangnam Unni sales price, VAT included |
| Full face pumping tip | Approximately 306,000 won | 169,000 won to 363,000 won | 4 clinics | Gangnam Unni sales price, VAT included |
| Full face (official website regular price) | Approximately 269,000 won | Not applicable | 4 clinics | Gangnam clinic official website, conversion including VAT |
The Gangnam Unni sales price is the lowest price per hospital for one time and excludes first visit, experience, and event products. The official website price is the average of 4 out of 21 Gangnam clinics where Potenza prices were confirmed. Guaranteed number of shots (600 shots, 700 shots, 900 shots), whether or not the tip is included, and conditions for confirming the opening of genuine tips vary from hospital to hospital, so even if the price is the same, the details are different.
| Purpose of writing a review | Number of reviews | Average price per time written in reviews |
|---|---|---|
| pores | 966 cases | Approximately 154,000 won |
| scar | 164 cases | Approximately 155,000 won |
| Both pores and scars | 412 cases | Approximately 162,000 won |
The review price is the payment amount written on the platform, so it is a mix of event prices, and the value-added tax, number of shots, and included management vary from hospital to hospital, so it is lower than the hospital's published price. Package amounts and amounts that bundle multiple procedures have been subtracted.
How did the research view RF microneedling?
For pores, the improvement rate increased as the number of treatments increased, and for scars, improvement was similar to that of fractionated CO2 laser, with combined treatment outperforming single treatment. The study below was conducted using the same series of RF microneedling equipment, not Potenza.
| Research | target | Results |
|---|---|---|
| Ren K et al., J Cosmet Dermatol 2022 | Retrospective observation of 75 patients with pores | Average 1.7 times. The rate of moderate or greater improvement after the first treatment was 13.8% for the nose, 8.9% for the forehead, and 11.1% for the cheeks, and increased as the number of treatments increased. The longer the heat application time (pulse width) was (300 ms), the greater the effect of the first treatment. |
| Huang Y et al., Lasers Med Sci 2024 | Ball pores 22 people, 3 times at 1-3 month intervals | The pores level 6 score decreased from 3.55 to 2.59, and the pain averaged 6.4 out of 10. |
| Wu X et al., Dermatol Ther 2022 | 20 people, 2 times | The skin barrier returned to standard on the 7th day of treatment, and there was no worsening of freckles or changes in sensitivity until 6 months. |
| Hendel K et al., Lasers Surg Med 2023 | Comparison of half faces of 15 people with scars, Episode 1 | It was the same as the fractional CO2 laser (texture improved by 1 point), the high frequency was more painful, and the laser caused greater erythema. |
| Li W et al., J Dermatolog Treat 2026 | Comparison of half faces of 30 people with scars, 3 times at 8 week intervals | The improvement score was the same as the CO2 laser, and high frequency had shorter erythema and crusting periods and less pigmentation. |
| Kim J et al., Yonsei Med J 2023 | Comparison of half faces of 23 Koreans, 3 times at 4-week intervals | The combination of high frequency and fractionated laser had better scar and acne scores than the laser alone. |
| Ou Y et al., Aesthetic Plast Surg 2026 | Dented scar test, part 56, 1,488 people | There were many comparisons where the combination treatment was superior to the single treatment, and the choice was made based on scar type, downtime, and pain. |
| Tan MG et al., Dermatol Surg 2021 | RF microneedling test part 42 | It is safe to repeat, and dermal reorganization continues up to 6 months after the procedure. |
Most papers are small studies of 15 to 75 people, and the equipment and treatment settings are different, so some of the figures are lower than the pores improvement rate in the later stage (around 10% after the first treatment). Most reviews are written immediately after the procedure, so research and reviews are not compared on the same level.
What process did DermaFocus have that had a high positive-review rate in Potenza reviews?
Based on the reviews, the highest positive-review rates were reviews using both pores and scars (88%) and reviews using pores (86%), and 81% were reviews about scars. The method of progression was similar for all three reviews: 2 to 3 times, at intervals of about 4 weeks, and 600 to 700 shots.
The differences in the reviews according to my concerns are as follows.
| Concerns written in reviews | Number of reviews | positive-review rate (effective reviews) | average number of times | It was quite painful | redness average | Price per review |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pores | 2,175 cases | 86% (842 cases) | 2.6 times | 30% | 1.9 days | Approximately 154,000 won |
| scar | 398 cases | 81% (131 cases) | 2.7 times | 46% | 3.2 days (23 cases) | Approximately 155,000 won |
| Both pores and scars | 957 cases | 88% (326 cases) | 2.6 times | 37% | 2.1 days | Approximately 162,000 won |
- Pores had a positive-review rate of 92% (130 reviews) among reviews concerned about loss of elasticity, which was higher than 80% (59 reviews) of reviews concerned about sebum. It received 2.6 reviews on average, 30% said it was quite painful, and the average redness was 1.9 days.
- Pain and recovery were greater in the scar review than in the pores review. 46% of the reviews said it was quite painful, redness and scabs lasted an average of 3.2 days, and 30% of the reviews (7 out of 23) lasted more than 5 days. 87% (60 cases) of reviews about the pitted scar were good.
- There were many reviews of Juvelook in combination with skin booster. 91% (181 reviews) liked Juvelook in combination, 88% (176 reviews) liked Juvelook in combination, and 86% (829 reviews) did not use it in combination.
There are other progress that have good reviews. There were 90% (50) reviews of the pores tip, 81% (58) of the reviews of the pumping tip, and 7 out of 7 reviews of the die tip.
86% of the reviews about the effect said it was good, but most of them were written immediately after the procedure. This comparison is based on reviews, not medical superiority or inferiority, and the results of the procedure vary from person to person, so the ratio of reviews does not guarantee the results. Because scars have limitations as a stand-alone procedure depending on their depth and shape, concurrent procedures are preferred in the paper, so during your consultation, ask what type of scar you have and whether it is a combination procedure.
Potenza What should I ask during a consultation?
Start by deciding whether your problem is pores, scars, or both, and ask for tips and combination procedures. This is because the scar reviews had greater pain and recovery time than the pores reviews.
| What to check | Questions to Ask |
|---|---|
| Concerns and Types | Are my pores caused by sebum or loss of elasticity? What does the scar look like and how deep is it? |
| In parallel with Tip | What are your tips? Do you add Juvelook or skin booster together? How do the price and pain change when combined? |
| Count and Interval | How many times will I receive it, and how many weeks apart will I receive it? How many shots are there and are they covered? |
| Anesthesia and Pain | Is it numbing cream or sedation? How much does it hurt? |
| redness and scab | How many days will my redness last and when can I start wearing makeup? What do I do if a scab forms? |
| price | Is it a one-time amount or a total package amount? Are tips and VAT included? Do you use genuine tips after opening them? |
| Actual practitioner | Does the doctor I consult perform the procedure themselves? |
DermaFocus compares Potenza Hospital like this
The recommendation guide applies the same four criteria to all clinics.
| Comparison Items | Verification criteria |
|---|---|
| Treatment information | Potenza tips and shot number information, number and interval, and whether or not information will be disclosed in case of side effects |
| medical staff | Specialist qualifications and actual practitioners confirmed by official sources |
| cost | Confirmation date, VAT, price conditions, tip and anesthesia included |
| Reviews | Repeated mention of sources, writing time, consultation and explanation for each platform |
The number of reviews and specialist qualifications are not used as scores to guarantee treatment results. The role of a recommendation guide is to display confirmed facts side by side using the same standards.
How this article was checked
The DermaFocus editorial team organized the reviews and research papers, and they were not supervised by medical professionals. This article does not constitute a medical diagnosis or recommendation for treatment, so please consult with a medical professional to determine whether and how to perform the procedure.
- Reviews: From the 15,009 Potenza reviews by Gangnam Unni and Babitalk (as of October 7, 2026), we classified all 1,763 of the 7,104 that mentioned pores or scars, and 2,000 of the 5,341 that mentioned only pores, for a total of 3,763. Of these, 3,530 whose purpose was pores or scars are the subject of this article.
- Analysis criteria: The effect ratio is based on 1,299 cases using the effect, 1,342 cases for pain level, 963 cases for frequency, 171 cases for interval, 149 cases for number of shots, and 319 cases for redness period.
- Study: 8 RF microneedling studies from PubMed. There are 3 pores, 4 scars, and 1 comprehensive review, and only the abstracts were checked.
- Price: This is the Gangnam Unni sales price as of October 7, 2026 (including VAT, excluding first visit, experience, and event products) and the price on Gangnam clinic's official website as of October 5, 2026. If there were three or more locations and only comparable configurations were averaged.
- Limitations: 99% of reviews were written within 1 month after the procedure. Only a small number of reviews mentioned pores, and only 240 reviews mentioned the tip type, 149 reviews mentioned the number of shots, and 209 reviews mentioned the shape of the scar. Reviews do not indicate the depth and energy settings established by the hospital.
- Personal Information: The original text of the review, the author, and the name of the clinic are not included.
Frequently Asked Questions
How is Potenza used differently for pores and acne scars?
In the later reviews, the number of repetitions, intervals, and shots were similar, but the pain and recovery period were different. The average number of pores was 2.6 and scars were 2.7, the interval was about 4 weeks, and the number of shots was 600 to 700 shots. The reviews that said it was quite painful were 30% for pores and 46% for scars, and the average duration of redness and scabs was 1.9 days and 3.2 days (23 cases). The hospital's settings, such as tip type and depth, were rarely written in the reviews.
Is Potenza effective against pores?
Among the 842 pores reviews, 86% of the 842 reviews said they were good, and 89% of the 494 reviews said their pores got smaller. 92% of reviews were concerned about loss of elasticity, and 80% were concerned about sebum. In a 2022 study, the rate of moderate or higher improvement after the first treatment was around 10% and increased as the number of treatments increased.
Is Potenza effective for acne scars?
Among the 131 scar reviews, 81% of them were good, and 87% (60) of the reviews were about pitted scars. In the study, RF microneedling improved scar texture similarly to fractionated CO2 laser, and combined with laser outperformed alone. For deep scars, there are limitations as a stand-alone treatment, so ask about the possibility of a combination treatment during your consultation.
How many times should I get Potenza?
The average number of reviews was 2.6, with the highest number of reviews receiving 3 (pores 48%, scars 47%). 78% of the first reviews, 86% of the second reviews, 85% of the third reviews, and 80% of the four or more reviews were good. The average of the 171 reviews that wrote an interval was 4.2 weeks.
How sick is Potenza?
Of the 1,342 cases that reported the level of pain, 34% said it was quite painful, 37% said it was bearable, and 30% said it hardly hurt at all. 46% of the reviews said the scar was quite painful, 40% of the reviews said the pores tip, and 20% of the reviews said the pumping tip. Most of the anesthesia used was topical anesthetic cream in 435 cases.
How long does the redness and scab last after Potenza?
The average time for redness and scabs to subside was 2.0 days (319 cases). The pores review was 1.9 days, the scar review was 3.2 days (23 cases), and the reviews that lasted more than 5 days were 9% for pores and 30% for scars. There is a study that showed that the skin barrier returned to standard on the 7th day after the procedure.
How much does Potenza cost?
Based on the Gangnam Unni sales price, the average tip for the entire face was about 195,000 won (26 clinics), and the pumping tip was about 306,000 won (4 clinics). The average amount per review written in reviews is approximately 156,000 won (1,542 reviews). Even the same price has different details depending on whether the number of shots is guaranteed and tip is included.
What are the differences between the reviews for regular tips and pumping tips?
90% (50) of the pores tip reviews and 81% (58) of the pumping tip reviews said it was good, while 40% of the pores tip and 20% of the pumping tip reviews said it was quite painful. 85% (100) of the pumping tip reviews were about receiving Juvelook or skin booster together.
How about getting it together with Juvelook or skin booster?
91% (181 cases) of reviews of Juvelook in combination were good, 88% (176 cases) of reviews of Juvelook in combination were good, and 86% (829 cases) of reviews not in combination with Juvelook were good. Both pores and scar reviews were 22% for the combination, and the price and pain will vary if used in combination, so ask about them at the consultation.
How long does the Potenza effect last?
You can’t tell from the reviews. 99% of the 693 reviews were written within one month after the procedure. Studies have shown that dermal reorganization with RF microneedling continues up to 6 months after the procedure.
Sources and verification dates
- Tan MG et al. Comprehensive review of RF microneedling, Dermatol Surg 2021 (PMID 33577211)(confirmed 2026-10-07): 42 randomized, split, blinded studies, safety in combination with repeat treatment, effectiveness lasting up to 6 months
- Ren K et al. Retrospective observation of 75 patients with RF microneedling to expand pores, J Cosmet Dermatol 2022 (PMID 36038248)(confirmed 2026-10-07): Average of 1.7 times, related to pulse width and rate of moderate or higher improvement after the first treatment.
- Huang Y et al. Buccal pores RF microneedling retrospective study, Lasers Med Sci 2024 (PMID 38609686)(Checked 2026-10-07): 22 patients 3 times, pores score 3.55 to 2.59, pain mean 6.42
- Wu X et al. RF microneedling and skin barrier, Dermatol Ther 2022 (PMID 36129670)(confirmed 2026-10-07): 20 patients, skin barrier recovered on day 7, no worsening of melasma until 6 months
- Hendel K et al. Fractionated CO2 laser vs. RF microneedling scar half face trial, Lasers Surg Med 2023 (PMID 36934435)(confirmed 2026-10-07): 1 time for 15 people, same 1 point improvement in texture, higher frequency hurts more
- Li W et al. RF microneedling versus fractionated CO2 laser atrophic scar half-face trial, J Dermatolog Treat 2026 (PMID 42312398)(confirmed 2026-10-07): 30 patients, 3 times at 8-week intervals, same improvement score, faster recovery with high frequency
- Kim J et al. Half-face trial combining RF microneedling and fractionated laser, Yonsei Med J 2023 (PMID 37992744)(confirmed 2026-10-07): 23 Korean patients, 3 treatments at 4-week intervals, combination is better than laser alone
- Ou Y et al. Atrophic acne scars laser, microneedle, and concurrent treatment network meta-analysis, Aesthetic Plast Surg 2026 (PMID 42429955)(confirmed 2026-10-07): 56 trials, 1,488 people, many comparisons in which the combination was ahead of the single treatment
- Gangnam Unni sales price (confirmed on 2026-10-07): 1 full face configuration out of 2,236 Potenza events, VAT included, clinic name not included
- Hospital public price (confirmed on 2026-10-05): One-time price from the official websites of 4 of the 21 Gangnam clinics where Potenza prices were confirmed, converted to include VAT, clinic name not included
- Gangnam Unni review and Babitalk review (platform review, confirmed 2026-10-07): Based on sample classification of 3,763 Potenza reviews. The original text of the review is not included.
Editorial responsibility and relationships
DermaFocus has no advertising, contract, or affiliation with any of the hospitals or manufacturers mentioned in this article, and has not received any money or sponsorship. This article is a compilation of information needed to select a procedure and does not replace a personal diagnosis or treatment plan.